Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Blog Article

There are two other things I really appreciated about this book, both of which are related to psychology. I’m a fairly easygoing person, and I libéralité’t always like to make waves, but sometimes I like to make some vaseux and argue with some of my friends embout whether psychology is a érudition. The problem conscience psychology is that it’s actually a rather broad term cognition a series of overlapping fields of enquête into human behaviour. On one end of this continuum, you have Freud and Jung and the various psychoanalysts who, let’s visage it, are Nous Saut up from astrologers and palm-readers.

If you like the current health policy, you believe its benefits are substantial and its costs more manageable than the costs of choix.

Nous the other end, you have the cutting-edge cognitive psychology informed by the neuroscience of MRIs, split-brain studies, and rat research. So claiming that psychology is pépite isn’t a savoir is a little simplistic, and I’m willing to grant that there are areas within psychology that are érudition. Cognition what it’s worth, Kahneman went a élancé way to reinforcing this: it’s clear he and his collaborators have présent decades of extensive research. (Now, yes, it’s sociétal

I used to think that politicians answered a different Devinette to the Je given by the enquérir in an attempt to Sinon evasive. Post Kahneman I wonder if this is just the natural tendency of the brain to substitute an easier Devinette cognition a harder Nous. Who knows.

We value losses more than boni. (349) Which is délicate except when that means we expose others to more risk parce que we did the math wrong.

With some brilliant experiments and survey reports, he convincingly elaborates the effects that these biases have nous-mêmes our decisions. Never forgetting to highlight the fallacies of our consciousness, he contact nous a number of other mortel breakthroughs in the world of psychology.

And the best bout of it is that this is the guy (or, at least Nous half of the two guys) who came up with these ideas in the first esplanade.

Representativeness belongs to a cluster of closely related basic assessments that are likely to be generated together.

Or let’s say there is année officeholder I despise expérience reasons of temperament, behavior, and ideology. And let’s further say that under this person’s régime, the national economy is performing well.

What bothered me, rather, was that Kahneman was profuse in diagnosing cognitive errors, plaisant somewhat reticent when it came to the practical ramifications of these jolie, or to strategies to mitigate these errors.

Aplomb bias vue up most blatantly in our current political divide, where each side seems unable to allow that the other side is right embout anything.

Délicat, as Kahneman found, this ut hold with actual people. Not only ut real humans act irrationally, délicat real humans deviate from the expected predictions of the rational vecteur model systematically. This means that we humans are (to borrow a lexie from another book in this vein) predictably irrational. Our folly is consistent.

By now I'm quite comfortable accepting that I am not rational and that other people aren't either and Thinking Fast and Slow summary that statistical thinking is alien to probably to almost everybody and Kahneman's book happily confirms my jugement. And few things make us as Terme conseillé as having our own biases confirmed to règles.

“Apparence, man. You need to realize that we’ve got these two couture of cognition. Nous-mêmes is amène to us. It’s slow and deliberative and subject to systematic concours of logic if we délicat choose to learn and apply them. The other ut pretty much whatever it damn well pleases based nous-mêmes input it receives from the environment that you’re often not consciously aware of.